According to Zou Jianjun, flight subsidies originated as government support to foster regional aviation. “After the CAAC transferred management of airports to local governments in 2004, cities began using subsidies to increase domestic and international flights,” he said.
The practice reached its peak in 2017, following a joint document by the National Development and Reform Commission and the CAAC promoting a national plan for civil airports.
However, as the number of flights grew, sustaining them became increasingly difficult.
In 2016, German carrier Lufthansa cited low demand for suspending its flight from Frankfurt to Shenyang, Liaoning, after four years, one of the first setbacks amid a boom in international flights in smaller Chinese cities. Though the route was reinstated in 2018, it was later halted during the pandemic and has not resumed.
Also in 2016, Australian airline Jetstar Airways canceled its route from the Gold Coast to Wuhan, Hubei Province, and British Airways discontinued its flight from London to Chengdu, Sichuan Province.
Experts attributed these suspensions to low occupancy rates after the standard three-year trial. Similarly, US-based United Airlines canceled its service between San Francisco and Xi’an, Shaanxi Province in 2017, less than two years after launch, due to insufficient demand.
Despite calls for a rational approach to increasing international flights, local governments have continued pouring resources into these initiatives.
In 2021, Chen Huan, an employee at CAAC subsidiary Capital Airport Holdings, revealed in a CAAC think tank article that Jiangxi Province, one of the less developed regions in Central China, allocated over 400 million yuan (US$57.1m) in flight subsidies in 2015. By 2019, the figure had skyrocketed to 1.8 billion yuan (US$257.1m). Meanwhile, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, a major metropolis bordering Hong Kong, opened nine new intercontinental routes in 2018 and added three more the following year.
A 2013 China Business News report cited internal CAAC statistics indicating that in 2012 alone, 18 provinces and municipalities collectively provided over 600 million yuan (US$85.7m) in subsidies to 107 international flights operated by 63 foreign airlines. Proponents of subsidies argue that a single international route can generate GDP equivalent to three or four domestic routes combined.
Data from market analysis firm CAPA - Center for Aviation showed that between 2014 and 2018, Chinese airlines launched 78 intercontinental routes – more than double the number in the previous five years. The growth was especially pronounced in second- and third-tier cities, where new routes far outpaced those in first-tier cities.
However, Lin Zhijie, an aviation analyst, noted that while all flights between China and the US averaged 79.8 percent occupancy, routes originating from second-tier cities often fell below this benchmark.
“Many of these new flights struggle to sustain themselves after several years, yielding no return on subsidies. They’ve become vanity projects for local governments, who are essentially paying to transport empty seats,” the former marketing director of a domestic airline told NewsChina.
Chen Huan’s article highlighted the lack of clear directives for how subsidies should be used. These flights are often discontinued when the subsidies run out.
Wu Jianrui, a researcher at the China University of Political Science and Law, argued that the increase in routes has fragmented the market, weakening the competitiveness of major hubs.
The CAAC’s July directive acknowledged these challenges, citing poor strategic planning, weak hub competitiveness, inefficient coordination and inadequate international services as key issues in China’s aviation sector.
“These problems stem not from local government subsidies but from the allocation of traffic rights,” an insider in the civil aviation industry who refused to reveal his name told NewsChina. He added that the directive signals a major shift in aviation policy – from supporting regional airports for international routes to strengthening the major hubs of Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou.
A major feature of the CAAC directive is its “3+7+N” model. While “3” means enhancing capacity in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou, “7” points to developing international hubs in seven major cities. These include Chengdu, Shenzhen and Xi’an, as well as Kunming in Southwest China’s Yunnan Province, Harbin in Northeast China’s Heilongjiang Province, Urumqi in Northwest China’s Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, and the megalopolis of Chongqing.
“N” designates cities as regional hubs. Though 12 are named, like Changsha, Xiamen and Wuhan, more could be added in the future.
To prevent market distortion and ensure fair competition, the directive also calls for stricter supervision of flight subsidies. “With better traffic rights allocation, local government funding can be effectively channeled to support transportation,” Lin said.